PART I: WRITTEN RECEPTION (70 points)
PART I: WRITTEN RECEPTION (70 points)
(ACCESS TO INFORMATION FROM WRITTEN TEXTS)
Read the text below and then answer questions 1–9.
REDUCING CAR USE IN CITIES
I Nowadays, there are large numbers of cars on the roads of big cities throughout the world. This
is causing serious problems. For example, air pollution from cars damages residents' health and the
constant noise harms their quality of life. Moreover, after spending many hours on the road,
people often arrive at their workplace too tired to work well. That is why city planners are trying to
5 reduce the use of cars in cities.
II There are various ways to achieve this goal. In some cities, for instance, drivers are required
to pay a fee when they enter busy parts of the city. Other cities create areas where cars are not
allowed at all. "These strategies are being used very effectively in several big cities. However, it is
usually difficult to introduce them," says sociologist Melissa Benson. "That's because most people
10 don't like to make big changes in their lives. For instance, car owners don't want to lose the freedom
to drive through the whole city."
III However, most residents gradually discover the benefits of car reduction programs. "Good
programs offer good alternatives to car use, such as excellent public transport and wide bike paths
for cycling. As a result, people can actually travel more quickly and comfortably," says Kevin
15 Rickman, a city planner from London. "In London, we provide these alternatives. And before we
even introduced the new program, we used a special advertising campaign to inform residents of
all its benefits – cleaner air, faster transport, quieter streets. It worked – people here are happy with
the changes."
IV In some cities, car reduction programs are made permanent only if they get the support of most
20 residents. These cities give residents a few months to experience the effect of the programs on their
lives. "This is a very helpful strategy," says Rickman. "It can really change people's minds. For
example, in 2006 in Stockholm, Sweden, residents got six months to experience a new car reduction
program. Before this period, most people objected to the program. But after they experienced its
benefits, most of them supported keeping it."
25 V According to Rickman, city planners often make changes in car reduction programs after
getting feedback from residents. "Sometimes the changes are small and sometimes they can be
bigger," he says. "But so far, no program has been completely cancelled. So it seems that most
people eventually learn that car reduction is a good idea."
<u>QUESTIONS</u> (70 points)
Answer questions 1–9 in <u>English</u>, according to the text. In questions 1, 3, 4 and 7, circle the number of the correct answer. In the other questions, follow the instructions.
1. What are we told about the large number of cars in big cities? (paragraph I)
(7 points)
2. What are cities doing to reduce car use? Give ONE answer from lines 6–8.
COMPLETE THE SENTENCE.
(8 points)
3. What do we learn from paragraph II about strategies to reduce car use?
4. What does Rickman explain about wide bicycle paths? (paragraph III)
5. How did London inform residents of the benefits of its program? (paragraph III)
COMPLETE THE SENTENCE.
6. What is ONE benefit of the changes London has made? Take your answer from lines 15–18.
COMPLETE THE SENTENCE.
7. What do we learn from Rickman about the strategy that is described in paragraph IV?
8. What happened in Stockholm after people experienced the car reduction program for six months? (paragraph IV)
COMPLETE THE SENTENCE.
9. According to Rickman, when might car reduction programs be changed? (paragraph V)
COMPLETE THE ANSWER.
שאלות ותגובות על השאלה
🎓 לא הבנתם משהו? קבלו הסבר נוסף ממרצה
שאלו כאן — ותקבלו מענה מוסמך.